Thursday, September 10, 2009

Are all your stories the same story?

In a “conversation with the author” at the back of Run by Ann Patchett, she says that all her books are about the same thing:

“In fact, I only write one book. I just write the same book over and over and over again -- which is my attempt to plagiarize The Magic Mountain....a group of strangers are thrown together, not in a tuberculosis sanitarium in Switzerland, but this time on a snowy night on a Boston street. It is the theme I will always come back to. It’s what compels me: what is our connection to strangers? What is our responsibility to strangers? Who do we love, and who do we take in as our family? That’s Bel Canto -- certainly that’s all of them.”

Run, by the way, is a fantastic read, and a novel that coincidentally pays tribute to Ted Kennedy in various ways.

I just finished The Magician's Assistant, also by Patchett, and I agree with her: same story, totally different setting and characters. I love her books more now knowing that this is how she sees them, different facets of the same gem she’s carrying around inside her.

So of course I’ve been asking myself: what is the one story that all my stories are about? What is that jewel I keep circling around, some question or compulsion or quandary at the center of my writing?

I’m early down the road in my own writing, but so far I see I have a fascination with the scraps of magic hidden in our everyday lives. By magic I don’t mean ghosts and fairies. More I mean the exceptional, awe-inspiring, path-bending, assumption up-turning moments we stumble on and how they offer the chance for us -- ahem, I mean, my characters -- to step into a wider view of their lives.

Like Mary finding the rose garden and then Colin in The Secret Garden

Like the stolen shoes falling out of the sky onto Stanley’s head in Louis Sachar’s Holes. Or later, how Stanley and Zero's intertwined family histories are unearthed from the bottom of dried-up Lake Green.


Like that movie, The Upside of Anger (2005), about the woman (played to perfection by Joan Allen) who thinks her husband has out-of-the-blue run off with his young secretary. The whole movie is about this woman’s journey through her own rage and how that rage transformed her even though it was based on a complete delusion.

The universe delivers these openings for us to re-write the story about our lives -- health scares, a passing comment from a stranger, an old letter we find filed in the wrong place, a puppy abandoned in the woods, a nasty argument with a loved one, a rejection letter.

What do we do with these openings? Do we recognize them as openings? How do we shape our own story around them? Am I a victim or a hero? Fabulous or a total loser? Totally alone or a child of the universe? Is that person an asshole or doing the best they can? It takes surprisingly little to knock us to either side of these narratives.

Because I’ve been known to over-analyze the juice out of everything, I’ve also been wondering: does it help or hinder the creative process to ask this kind of meta-question about what our capital S story is? There are so many unconscious streams at work when we write. Is it helpful to try to make them more conscious or should we just sit back and enjoy the ride?

We are cautioned -- especially as writers for kids and young adults -- not to push our agendas, not to get too heavy about “message” because readers can smell that a mile away and the story will collapse under its own weight. But this issue Ann Patchett raises is a bit different than what’s the moral of your story. It’s more about what drives us to want to tell the story in the first place. Or what’s the heat that warms our stories from beneath?

So, do you have one story that all your stories are about? And do you think it helps to know or would you rather not know?

9 comments:

vintage simple said...

I'm not a writer, so I don't really have an answer to your questions... But I am very intrigued by this idea that we all, to borrow your analogy, carry around this little jewel that we come back to over and over again. Does it evolve and change at all? Is it more like the little grain of sand that turns into a pearl after all of our endless ruminating..? Or has it been a gemstone all along, patiently waiting for us to discover it (or re-discover it, as it may be)?
You see, I have nothing but more questions... Not very helpful.
-maria

Sharon Creech said...

If this is so, that all my stories are the same story, it would not be surprising, in that the things that are important to me remain consistent and intriguing and are what I choose to write about.

Having said that, when I'm in the middle of writing each new story, I am absolutely convinced that I am exploring something new. It is only later, with much distance, that I can see that I might have been on this path before, but I took different turns along the way.

alisonwells said...

Identity, memory, belonging, how we place ourselves in the world, how people see the story of themselves, these are the overall themes that I recognise in my work. This is a heartwarming post showing that perhaps there is great merit in exploring and reexploring the same ideas.

Cassandra Vert said...

I analyze things to death too, but it helps me understand myself and write better. I think the best writers not only know their own stories but embrace them and craft them into something personally and socially transcendent. Bad writers beat the same dead horse without realizing what they're doing. There's a world of difference.

multitudeofm said...

That's a great question, and for me, the answer is yes.

My protagonists are usually about to be set adrift, to find their way in the world.

A little Mary Sue-ish, I suppose, seeing as I'm about to finish university and be set free to swim in the great sea of life.

Robin L said...

I have a fascination with the scraps of magic hidden in our everyday lives. By magic I don’t mean ghosts and fairies. More I mean the exceptional, awe-inspiring, path-bending, assumption up-turning moments we stumble on and how they offer the chance for us -- ahem, I mean, my characters -- to step into a wider view of their lives.

Love this. In fact, it is exactly what I tell kids when I explain the broader view of what I write about.

I know that writers have core issues they explore again and again in their work, but that it might be the same story over and over? Very interesting. And probably not too surprising...

WinstonWoman said...

tories are everywhere, waiting to be built. Someone must see the story in order for it to be told. In order for the story to exist, the right pieces must be pulled into some sort of construction. Those pieces exist in unconstructed space with millions of other pieces. We see the pieces we know how to see. We order those pieces how we know how to order the pieces.

If the story is the same every time it is because the storyteller has a narrow line of sight. They can only see a certain set of pieces. And working with those same pieces, they are blind to the infinite possibilities of order.

I'm not sure I mean this to be as negative as it may come across. I think the same story can be told over and over and over again, in several different settings/genres/with different characters and remain beautiful. I guess I also think there is no denying a certain one-dimensionality of a storyteller who can only see one story throughout all of life's varied experiences.

jmartinlibrarian said...

Loved your post.

My favorite stories employ classic archetypes and three act plot structures. There is something deeply satisfying about a hero facing the darkness and overcoming it. And yes, the story remains the same.

This thread reminds me of Campbell's Hero with a Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth.

We tell the same tales over and over again because we are inextricably linked by common dreams, fears, and hopes. The story is a communion.

Dorothy said...

Lovely writing, Cate.

 

Florence Catherine Gardner.
'Minima' template adapted by Stephanie Williams.